Видео

It takes about 4 years to create an aircraft carrier in the modern us

He saved whites but you all so racist that you don’t even care. That’s a shame.

We might have to find out just how fast we can produce aircraft carriers when Biden gets into WWII!

When we have to very fast.

Let's see. The EMALS on the Ford still has a reliability problem, it is failing about 15% of its design MTBF. That doesn't sound so good for the US Navy. It also has problems with the blast shields and the elevators. The EMALS problem is said to be a design problem and won't be resolved until 2025. How that affects the Kennedy, remains to be seen. Further, it sounds like the plan for 12 super carriers is on hold while the Navy rethinks its future. The current thinking sounds like the US may back off on super carriers and opt for more small ships, like destroyers. It seems that in today's world, carriers are just a big missile target and can't get in range to launch its aircraft.

Sept 23rd 2017 Rev 12:1 also known as the Morning Star prophecy was fulfilled It was also the cutting ceremony for the first piece of steel for the new Enterprise Operation Warpspeed isn't what people think 🍿

un manned is good idea imho. the sailors get to sit at home with family getting paid while 5G AI does the dangerous job. isnt that the dream??

❤

I served on the old Kennedy (CVA-67). Good times.

Today, the USA has 1% of global shipbuilding capacity and China has more shipbuilding capacity than the rest of the world put together.

You older engineering

You’ll never see a USS Trump because the only thing he served was two call girls and Putin.

This 💗 Amazing 👏 Aircraft Cariya ❤❤❤😊😊😊

Bad analogy. USS Ford was first in its class and had many new technologies. We can and have built more that 2 a year.

Surely the whole point of stealth is that your opponents don’t know you are there, and you can strike them at a distance and get out without being observed. Manoeuvrability only comes into play when you are observed, then close up and personal with your opponents, at which point stealth has mostly left the equation. Therefore a stealth plane that relies on manoeuvrability, is hardly a stealth plane at all.

Sure hope we are building more than one as we speak.

I have the privilege of getting to work near her at the same shipyard. It’s amazing getting to see her be built.

I still think the YF-23 is a much better design fighter aircraft.To me,it's just a cool looking plane.

During WWII, the U.S. built 151 aircraft carriers. The majority of these were escort carriers. It took on average 14 to 22 months to build these ships . Before the war it took more than 3 years to build an aircraft carrier.

5 to 6 yrs should be the current practice, because China latest Fujian with electronic catapult systems took 5 years to construct. But i jeard a different story from US. They took 5 yrs to do repairs and maintenance. This is not surprised. Hugh corruption, inadequate workers, insufficient naval construction facilities. And much more

How sad

All Russian air daffiness systems are better than their supposed western counterparts with s300 ( in all its versions), s400 and s500 on top of all western systems. Additionally, you have the Iranian systems only second to the Russian ones and closing in. So I do not know who payed you to claim this classification ( the person/s) but it is not hard to figure out the party you are trying to kiss ass to.

The sky dome air defense system produced by Turkey is many times longer range and more effective than Israel's

The American Great Era is Gone with the wind!!

USS DEI only ... hope it doesn't torch itself.

Never heard of him ... rewriting history again ...

They can actually build carriers at a quicker rate but it makes sense to slow it down and get it right.

The thought that the Navy would name a ship after a man who stated that “only suckers would serve “ and mocked John McCain who was a POW saying “I don’t like people who get captured during war “

Please also cover the new China aircraft carrier killer hypersonic missiles too. Thank you.

😅😅😅how come 9 months ago this is fifth month of 2024

Very quickly, just more inflation and debt

Would be a better production if the narration was done by a human, not an AI that has issues pronouncing names and acronyms.. EMALS for example.

Iron dome is tried and tested

The ship that will be named after Donald J. Trump will be built by the Russians to replace the Moskva sunked by the Ukrainians. 😂

So the 5 minute training time in command and conquer isn't actually that bad in comparison.

As a retired US Navy Aviation Maintenance Chief who served on many aircraft carriers, I like to see another next generation carrier named America. I know the US Navy has named an amphibious carrier by that name, but it is not a CVN. If not America, then I strongly feel the name should be CVN Jimmy Carter who honorably served in the Navy and became a US President.

Why decommission functioning ships in place of new ones why not just expand the fleet?

Why did they name an entire class of fleet aircraft carriers after a president literally no-one voted for ?

When reading many comments i thought not many understand how USA industries change during ramp threw war. During this time everything that is needed to build up, replacing ect goes to the military. ITS THE LAW. Also ships that are removed from active service goes into whats called MOTHBALL ( jets,helicopters, tanks & ships) at first fuels, oils, water, ect are removed. Its cleaned up then gets a wrapping. This is done to preserve everything inside ( like ships electronics This is done incase carrier got sunk, big missile holes, what ever. The carrier can be fitted so fast and onto the area of battle. Same with planes,tanks,helicopters ect. Now the older like a ship is in mothball and no longer close to what we have then everything is removed, stripped down. The ships hull can be sold for scrap metal.

Built more!!!

I think that's a major downside of America's modern carriers (as well as other units), namely that they're so expensive and take so long to build compared to previous carriers such as the Essex class which were relatively cheap and quick to build so we could crank out tons of them like crazy and thus be able to replace any losses and or overwhelm the enemy via numbers, and likewise the planes of those days were much cheaper and faster to make so they too could be quickly replaced or used to overwhelm an enemy. Of course, modern jets and carriers are way more advanced, and the world has changed so we probably can't backtrack on any of those advancements, but still I think the US would benefit by looking into how to make military units that could be quickly and cheaply built like in WW2 in the event of a major conflict where such a thing is needed. Then again, perhaps they've already looked into it and already have contingency plans, but still.

⛑️⛑️⛑️⛽⛽⛽⛽🥀🤿💎📚

It's missing a Starbucks cafe for the long grueling work schedule.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Served aboard her 1975 - 1977. Of the 4 ships I served on Enterprise is the one I most identify with. What an iconic ship!